Cambridge-educated physician, 40, ‘had intercourse with a number of girls in his GP surgical procedure’s consulting rooms throughout working hours

A Cambridge-educated physician accused of getting intercourse with a number of girls at his GP follow lied about his members of the family being unwell whereas making an attempt to ‘juggle’ his string of girlfriends, a tribunal heard.

Thomas Plimmer, 40, has been hit with a barrage of allegations from at the least half a dozen girls, together with a ‘susceptible’ colleague who claims he compelled her into weekly intercourse periods at his GP follow in Swindon, Wiltshire.

The physician went on to ask two girls he met on relationship websites to the surgical procedure the place he engaged in intercourse acts with them throughout working hours, the Medical Practitioners Tribunal heard.

On a separate event, he’s accused of sending unsolicited footage of genitals that have been ‘taken at work’ to a different girls he met on a relationship website.

It was additionally alleged within the tribunal that Plimmer threatened one other lady, saying that he knew ‘the place she lives’ and if the ‘c*** takes me to the GMC, I will slit her throat’.

Thomas Plimmer, 40, (pictured) has been hit with allegations from a half a dozen women, including a 'vulnerable' colleague who claims he forced her into weekly sex sessions at his GP practice in Swindon, Wiltshire
Plimmer (pictured) invited two women he met on dating sites to the surgery and engaged in sex acts with them during working hours, the Medical Practitioners Tribunal heard

Plimmer’s relationship together with his colleague started with an ‘innuendo a couple of chocolate rabbit’, the tribunal, held by video convention, heard.

In Could 2018, the Cambridge-educated medic confirmed her a video of him having intercourse with one other girls ‘with out warning’, stated Mark Monaghan, who was presenting the case on behalf of the Normal Medical Council.

He then allegedly tried to ‘kiss’ and ‘contact’ her, with Mr Monaghan claiming Plimmer would ‘come into her room together with his trousers undone and flirt along with her’ regardless of her refusing his advances, The Sun reported.

Mr Monaghan argued that Plimmer knew the colleague was ‘susceptible’ and exhibited an ‘abuse of his place’.

It was additional claimed that the girl walked in on Plimmer performing intercourse acts in his consulting room on a number of events. The tribunal additionally heard that he would regularly ship her express movies, which he admits.

In one other occasion, when the girl was ‘clearly distressed’, Plimmer put his ‘arm round her’ and led her into his consulting room to ‘cheer her up’. He then positioned his fingers on her genitals, the tribunal was instructed.

There was sexual behaviour with the colleague on a ‘weekly foundation’ however Plimmer insists it was ‘all the time consensual’. The lady allegedly was fearful to report the scenario and apprehensive she can be blamed.

Plimmer met one other lady on a relationship app on New 12 months’s Eve 2019 and introduced her to the consulting room at his follow of January 3. The tribunal heard that he made a mug of tea, locked the door and she or he carried out a intercourse act on him.

Mr Monaghan argued that she was ‘uncomfortable’ as a result of she may ‘hear individuals stroll previous’.

The tribunal was additionally instructed that he met one other lady on-line, recognized as Miss C, in Could 2018. The pair went to the tennis at Wimbledon and he even met her mother and father.

He then began ‘making excuses’ to keep away from seeing her, together with that his mom had suffered ‘a number of severe strokes’ and wanted to be in a rehab facility.

‘These excuses have been deliberate lies to permit him to juggle and see different girls as an alternative,’ Mr Monaghan argued.

In Could 2020, after the pair had been collectively for 2 years, she is known to have grow to be involved by his distant behaviour. He invited her to his follow they usually had intercourse throughout working hours, it was claimed.

Plimmer allegedly continued to be ‘attentive from a distance’ however had already been residing with one other lady, Miss D, whom he had met in January 2019.

He cancelled a number of of his first dates with Miss D, claiming he had a sick brother in hospital. He even despatched pictures and ‘play by play’ updates on his brother’s alleged circumstances, regardless of the story being ‘wholly fabricated’, the tribunal heard.

A fifth lady, whom he additionally met on a relationship website in 2021, claimed he would ship her pictures of his genitally that have been taken at work. And a sixth lady has alleged that he threatened to chop her throat.

Leave A Comment