Within the absence of “precise issuers” of the “rip-off tokens,” the plaintiffs argued that Uniswap facilitated the trades at challenge by “offering a market and amenities for bringing collectively consumers and sellers of securities” for a transaction payment, “hoping that this Court docket may overlook the truth that the present state of cryptocurrency regulation leaves them with out recourse, at the very least as to the precise claims alleged on this go well with.”
